127 research outputs found
Platform Dependent Verification: On Engineering Verification Tools for 21st Century
The paper overviews recent developments in platform-dependent explicit-state
LTL model checking.Comment: In Proceedings PDMC 2011, arXiv:1111.006
DiVinE-CUDA - A Tool for GPU Accelerated LTL Model Checking
In this paper we present a tool that performs CUDA accelerated LTL Model
Checking. The tool exploits parallel algorithm MAP adjusted to the NVIDIA CUDA
architecture in order to efficiently detect the presence of accepting cycles in
a directed graph. Accepting cycle detection is the core algorithmic procedure
in automata-based LTL Model Checking. We demonstrate that the tool outperforms
non-accelerated version of the algorithm and we discuss where the limits of the
tool are and what we intend to do in the future to avoid them
BioDiVinE: A Framework for Parallel Analysis of Biological Models
In this paper a novel tool BioDiVinEfor parallel analysis of biological
models is presented. The tool allows analysis of biological models specified in
terms of a set of chemical reactions. Chemical reactions are transformed into a
system of multi-affine differential equations. BioDiVinE employs techniques for
finite discrete abstraction of the continuous state space. At that level,
parallel analysis algorithms based on model checking are provided. In the
paper, the key tool features are described and their application is
demonstrated by means of a case study
Variations on Multi-Core Nested Depth-First Search
Recently, two new parallel algorithms for on-the-fly model checking of LTL
properties were presented at the same conference: Automated Technology for
Verification and Analysis, 2011. Both approaches extend Swarmed NDFS, which
runs several sequential NDFS instances in parallel. While parallel random
search already speeds up detection of bugs, the workers must share some global
information in order to speed up full verification of correct models. The two
algorithms differ considerably in the global information shared between
workers, and in the way they synchronize.
Here, we provide a thorough experimental comparison between the two
algorithms, by measuring the runtime of their implementations on a multi-core
machine. Both algorithms were implemented in the same framework of the model
checker LTSmin, using similar optimizations, and have been subjected to the
full BEEM model database.
Because both algorithms have complementary advantages, we constructed an
algorithm that combines both ideas. This combination clearly has an improved
speedup. We also compare the results with the alternative parallel algorithm
for accepting cycle detection OWCTY-MAP. Finally, we study a simple statistical
model for input models that do contain accepting cycles. The goal is to
distinguish the speedup due to parallel random search from the speedup that can
be attributed to clever work sharing schemes.Comment: In Proceedings PDMC 2011, arXiv:1111.006
Parallel symbolic state-space exploration is difficult, but what is the alternative?
State-space exploration is an essential step in many modeling and analysis
problems. Its goal is to find the states reachable from the initial state of a
discrete-state model described. The state space can used to answer important
questions, e.g., "Is there a dead state?" and "Can N become negative?", or as a
starting point for sophisticated investigations expressed in temporal logic.
Unfortunately, the state space is often so large that ordinary explicit data
structures and sequential algorithms cannot cope, prompting the exploration of
(1) parallel approaches using multiple processors, from simple workstation
networks to shared-memory supercomputers, to satisfy large memory and runtime
requirements and (2) symbolic approaches using decision diagrams to encode the
large structured sets and relations manipulated during state-space generation.
Both approaches have merits and limitations. Parallel explicit state-space
generation is challenging, but almost linear speedup can be achieved; however,
the analysis is ultimately limited by the memory and processors available.
Symbolic methods are a heuristic that can efficiently encode many, but not all,
functions over a structured and exponentially large domain; here the pitfalls
are subtler: their performance varies widely depending on the class of decision
diagram chosen, the state variable order, and obscure algorithmic parameters.
As symbolic approaches are often much more efficient than explicit ones for
many practical models, we argue for the need to parallelize symbolic
state-space generation algorithms, so that we can realize the advantage of both
approaches. This is a challenging endeavor, as the most efficient symbolic
algorithm, Saturation, is inherently sequential. We conclude by discussing
challenges, efforts, and promising directions toward this goal
Reachability in Biochemical Dynamical Systems by Quantitative Discrete Approximation (extended abstract)
In this paper, a novel computational technique for finite discrete
approximation of continuous dynamical systems suitable for a significant class
of biochemical dynamical systems is introduced. The method is parameterized in
order to affect the imposed level of approximation provided that with
increasing parameter value the approximation converges to the original
continuous system. By employing this approximation technique, we present
algorithms solving the reachability problem for biochemical dynamical systems.
The presented method and algorithms are evaluated on several exemplary
biological models and on a real case study.Comment: In Proceedings CompMod 2011, arXiv:1109.104
Mightyl: A compositional translation from mitl to timed automata
Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) was first proposed in the early 1990s as a specification formalism for real-time systems. Apart from its appealing intuitive syntax, there are also theoretical evidences that make MITL a prime real-time counterpart of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). Unfortunately, the tool support for MITL verification is still lacking to this day. In this paper, we propose a new construction from MITL to timed automata via very-weak one-clock alternating timed automata. Our construction subsumes the well-known construction from LTL to Büchi automata by Gastin and Oddoux and yet has the additional benefits of being compositional and integrating easily with existing tools. We implement the construction in our new tool MightyL and report on experiments using Uppaal and LTSmin as back-ends
Explicit Model Checking of Very Large MDP using Partitioning and Secondary Storage
The applicability of model checking is hindered by the state space explosion
problem in combination with limited amounts of main memory. To extend its
reach, the large available capacities of secondary storage such as hard disks
can be exploited. Due to the specific performance characteristics of secondary
storage technologies, specialised algorithms are required. In this paper, we
present a technique to use secondary storage for probabilistic model checking
of Markov decision processes. It combines state space exploration based on
partitioning with a block-iterative variant of value iteration over the same
partitions for the analysis of probabilistic reachability and expected-reward
properties. A sparse matrix-like representation is used to store partitions on
secondary storage in a compact format. All file accesses are sequential, and
compression can be used without affecting runtime. The technique has been
implemented within the Modest Toolset. We evaluate its performance on several
benchmark models of up to 3.5 billion states. In the analysis of time-bounded
properties on real-time models, our method neutralises the state space
explosion induced by the time bound in its entirety.Comment: The final publication is available at Springer via
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24953-7_1
Probabilistic Model-Based Safety Analysis
Model-based safety analysis approaches aim at finding critical failure
combinations by analysis of models of the whole system (i.e. software,
hardware, failure modes and environment). The advantage of these methods
compared to traditional approaches is that the analysis of the whole system
gives more precise results. Only few model-based approaches have been applied
to answer quantitative questions in safety analysis, often limited to analysis
of specific failure propagation models, limited types of failure modes or
without system dynamics and behavior, as direct quantitative analysis is uses
large amounts of computing resources. New achievements in the domain of
(probabilistic) model-checking now allow for overcoming this problem.
This paper shows how functional models based on synchronous parallel
semantics, which can be used for system design, implementation and qualitative
safety analysis, can be directly re-used for (model-based) quantitative safety
analysis. Accurate modeling of different types of probabilistic failure
occurrence is shown as well as accurate interpretation of the results of the
analysis. This allows for reliable and expressive assessment of the safety of a
system in early design stages
- …